FAR plus — Smoke Test (Golden Prompts)

A concise, repeatable validation set to verify FAR/SLF/MCF/SR behavior in a new model instance (Builder preview & release). Wraps each exact prompt in div.prompt_area for copy‑safe archival alongside What/Why/Pass signals.

How to Run (Builder Preview)

  1. Start a fresh session with the model candidate. Ensure any Data Analysis / code tools are enabled when required.
  2. Run prompts in order. After each, record observations under Pass signals and note anomalies.
  3. For quantitative items, export tables if available; otherwise, capture text output verbatim.
  4. Do not coach the model mid‑prompt. If it fails, rerun once; if it fails again, log as systemic.

Golden Prompts — Core

  1. 1Warmup

    What: Checks Δ/Π/Ψ literacy and SLF snippet discipline in tight prose.

    Why: Ensures symbol familiarity and concise, correct formatting before deeper tasks.

    Pass signals: 4 sentences, one valid SLF block, correct uses of Δ, Π{…}, Ψ; no over‑talk.

    Prompt: explain 'ΔDialectic , ΠPartitions , ΨLens' in 4 sentences with one tiny SLF block..

  2. 2Onboarding path

    What: 3‑step quick start mapping Foundational Metaphors → SLF‑MA‑00 → Ubuntu & Adaptive Mind.
    Why: Validates curriculum flow and Ubuntu alignment.
    Pass signals: Exactly 3 steps; each step names artifacts and intent; no missing bridge text.

    Prompt: Map Foundational Metaphors → SLF-MA-00 → Ubuntu & Adaptive Mind in a 3-step quick start.

  3. 3Δ basic

    What: Hold tension for Δ{Obligation ∥ Compassion} with roles U and V; no synthesis.
    Why: Confirms dialectic discipline (no premature resolution).
    Pass signals: Names U/V, articulates pressures, explicitly avoids synthesis/compromise.

    Prompt: Δ{Obligation ∥ Compassion} with U and V; hold tension; no synthesis.

  4. 3Δ informativec

    What: Explain Hold tension for Δ{Obligation ∥ Compassion} with roles U and V; no synthesis.
    Why: Confirms comprehension and articulation.
    Pass signals: paragraph in context.

    Prompt: Explain 'Δ{Obligation ∥ Compassion} with U and V;' hold tension; no synthesis in a paragraph using Authority ∥ Friend

  5. 4Π + Ψ

    What: Partition then lens: Π{ "Math" ∥ "Art" ∥ "Science" } with Ψ Pattern; return Same/Different/Integrated.
    Why: Tests partition fidelity plus lens synthesis without collapsing distinctions.
    Pass signals: 3×(Same/Different/Integrated) cleanly separated; Ψ used explicitly.

    Prompt: Π{ "Math" ∥ "Art" ∥ "Science" } Ψ Pattern — give Same/Different/Integrated.

  6. 5Graded similarity (qualitative)

    What: Rank Algebra ∥ Geometry ∥ Calculus ∥ Symbolic Language on (method, criterion).
    Why: Checks rubric articulation and comparative reasoning without numbers.
    Pass signals: Clear axes definitions; reasoned ordering; acknowledges ambiguity.

    Prompt: Rank Algebra ∥ Geometry ∥ Calculus ∥ Symbolic Language on (method, criterion).

  7. 6Graded similarity (quantitative)

    What: With Data Analysis on, compute pairwise Jaccard(method, criterion) per EX‑Π‑003; render a table.
    Why: Verifies tool use, metric correctness, and tabular clarity.
    Pass signals: Legitimate set definitions, 6 pairwise scores, tidy table.

    Prompt: (with Data Analysis on) Compute Jaccard(method, criterion) pairwise per EX-Π-003 and render a table.

  8. 7SR-00

    What: Use ⌘Rhyme(Reason, Metaphor) to propose a research prompt; show resonance.
    Why: Confirms Symbolic Rhyme operator semantics.
    Pass signals: One research prompt + a short resonance trace showing the rhyme.

    Prompt: Use ⌘Rhyme(Reason, Metaphor) to propose a research prompt; show the resonance.

  9. 8ARF modulation

    What: Given 3 candidate rules, show ARF weights and an activator/deactivator example.
    Why: Tests rule weighting and control toggles.
    Pass signals: Numeric or ordinal weights; explicit activator/deactivator demonstration.

    Prompt: Given three candidate rules, show ARF weights and an activator/deactivator example.

  10. 9MCF audit

    What: Model says “speed over safety”; run a tiny MCF audit and propose a balanced policy.
    Why: Ensures reflective checks before behavioral shifts.
    Pass signals: Risks/mitigations enumerated; concrete policy with guardrails.

    Prompt: We want speed over safety. Run a tiny MCF audit; propose a balanced policy.

  11. 10Audience split

    What: Π{ Human ∥ AI } with Ψ LensMeaning; deliver integrated plan and contrasts.
    Why: Checks audience partitioning and recombination.
    Pass signals: Separate needs; shared core; integrated final plan.

    Prompt: Π{ Human ∥ AI } Ψ LensMeaning — deliver an integrated plan with contrasts.

  12. 11Ubuntu alignment

    What: Refactor a decision so Belonging ⊨ Identity and Care ⊢ Adaptivity are honored.
    Why: Tests ethical alignment hooks.
    Pass signals: Shows concrete refactor; cites both entailment and inference relationships.

    Prompt: Refactor a decision so Belonging ⊨ Identity and Care ⊢ Adaptivity are honored.

  13. 12Chain

    What: Wire SLF → ARF → MCF for a reflective agent loop and cite sections used.
    Why: Validates cross‑framework choreography.
    Pass signals: Correct ordering; minimal but explicit citations; loop semantics clear.

    Prompt: Wire SLF → ARF → MCF for a reflective agent loop and cite sections used.

Golden Prompts — Meaning layer (quick smoke test)

  1. M1∪ vs ∩ (Meaning table)

    What: Compare Union vs Intersection via the Meaning table + real example.
    Why: Validates semantic lenses on basic set ops.
    Pass signals: Accurate meanings; grounded real‑world case.

    Prompt: Explain Union ∪ vs. Intersection ∩ using the Meaning table, then give a real-world example.

  2. M2Law 1 on Δ

    What: Apply Law 1 to Δ{Stability ∥ Novelty}; hold tension without resolving.
    Why: Ensures respect for the non‑collapse rule you defined.
    Pass signals: Tension held; law cited or implied; no synthesis.

    Prompt: Apply OP-LEGEND-ONE-SLOT Law 1 to Δ{Stability ∥ Novelty}; hold tension without resolving.

  3. M3Law 2 (K fixed)

    What: With total K fixed, narrate how Order↑ affects Chaos via Law 2 (Quantity(Order) = Quantity(Chaos)).
    Why: Checks conservation‑style reasoning in Meaning layer.
    Pass signals: Two coherent scenarios; explicit K‑constraint; sensible tradeoffs.

    Prompt: Using OP-LEGEND-ONE-SLOT Law 2, show how increasing Order changes Chaos when total K is fixed; narrate two scenarios.

  4. M4Π{Order ∥ Chaos} Ψ Pattern

    What: Return Same / Different / Integrated with 3 facets each.
    Why: Exercises partition+pattern again within Meaning layer.
    Pass signals: 9 facets total; pattern lens explicit; no conflation.

    Prompt: Π{ Order ∥ Chaos } Ψ Pattern — return Same / Different / Integrated with 3 facets each.

Run Log Template

Copy this for each prompt run
Prompt ID: (e.g., 3 / M2)
Date/Time:
Model Version / Build:
Tools: (e.g., Data Analysis = on; Web = off)
Result Summary:
Pass Signals Observed:
Deviations / Notes:
Follow-ups: